Terroir—Not Just Dirt
By Codey Foster
The other day I was unpacking our most recent shipment of
Lopez de Heredia Grand Reservas, the 1995 Bosconia. The Lopez Grand Reservas
come wrapped in a transparent white tissue paper and, although I like the look
of the tissue wrapped bottles in the store and in my cellar, I always try to
unwrap at least one of the bottles to put on the shelf as a display so everyone
can get a good look at the label, and vintage, and so fourth. In any case, I
noticed that the ’95 that I’d freshly unwrapped had a pretty healthy layer of
dust deposited on the bottom of the bottle so I wiped it off with my finger and
smelled it. That’s what us wine people do after all—were always smelling and
tasting things, random things, even things that ought not be smelled or tasted.
Anyway, that dust--Lopez de Heredia dust,
undoubtedly—smelled like only one other thing that I’d ever smelled before, and
that is Lopez de Heredia wine. All wines from Lopez (red or white) come with a
distinct spicy/pungent quality to them, a quality that I’ve long attributed to
combinations of American oak and soil, however, after analyzing the dust
deposited on the bottom of that particular bottle of Grand Reserva, I can only
believe that at least a major part of that spicy/pungent flavor profile that is
Lopez de Heredia, must be imparted into the wine from the winery itself.
This does make some sense after all. With the Grand Reservas
especially, the wines are allowed to age in barrel for almost ten years at
which time the especially porous American oak permits a slow gas exchange,
allowing small amounts of winery air into the barrel and ultimately into the
wine. Frequent racking and re-racking also facilitates atmospheric contact with
the wine over the course of barrel aging. The winery influence, however,
doesn’t stop here but continues in the bottle as the wine ages on its cork, a
process through which it continues to breath Lopez air for almost ten years and
sometimes even more before it is released onto the retail market. All said and
done, the end result is a spectacular range of reds and whites with complex
secondary and tertiary aromas that could not have been produced from a vineyard
alone.
And so it is my personal belief that the mold, the dust, the
funk, and the air that make up the Lopez cellars are all a contribution of
Terroir, and in some cases perhaps an even more substantial contribution of
Terroir than the soil itself.
Now, Lopez de Heredia is perhaps the most prominent example of
Terroir outside the vineyard however, similar although less obvious examples
exist all over the Old World. Even in Burgundy.
I once heard (or read, I can’t remember) a winemaker attest
that fruit grown in Vosne-Romanee but fermented in Morey-st-Denis took on more
of a Morey flavor profile than a Vosne-Romanee flavor profile and similarly
Morey-st-Denis fruit fermented in Vosne-Romanee took on a little more of a Vosne-Romanee
fruit profile than a Morey-st-Denis fruit profile. This variation suggests only
one thing—that the native yeasts of each village conduct fermentation to their
own accord in order to produce wines that, regardless to vineyard site, are
characteristic of the village where they were fermented.
Also in Burgundy--as with Lopez de Heredia--terroir of producer can sometimes
manifest itself over terroir of vineyard
site. I’ve seen this happen with Gouges, Laurent, and sometimes even
Coche-Dury (all first-rate producers, or course) however the most prominent
example I can think of is Harmand-Geoffroy, a producer that imparts a distinct
and refined truffley earthiness (sometimes bordering on Brettanomyces, but only
stylistically) into his wines. This distinctly Geoffroy quality is most
annunciated in his Grand Crus and Premier Crus, however, even in his most basic
Bourgogne ‘La Nouroy’, Geoffroy swagger is evident and firmly delineated.
Please understand though that these observations are in no
way to denounce the relevance of vineyard site, and soil. Vineyard site is the
most influential element of terroir for many domains in Burgundy (and beyond)
and wines from producers like Fourrier, Barthod, and Jadot (among many others),
truly attest to this. That’s why Burgundy is Burgundy—it’s why so many
winemakers go to the trouble to tediously vinify different vineyard plots
separately—dirt matters. That said, it is not the only thing that matters. So
many other factors contribute to a sense of place other than vineyard site.
Ultimately terroir is a package of where a wine is grown and where a wine is
made, as to give the drinker a true sense of place as instilled in the wine in
the vineyard and winery.
No comments:
Post a Comment